Analisis perbandingan PSC gross split Indonesia dengan fiscal term dari beberapa negara di Kawasan Asia Tenggara studi kasus lapangan produksi Blok X, Blok Y
P Penerapan PSC Gross Split Indonesia pada industri hulu migas di Indonesia telah berjalan sejak 2017 dengan harapan mampu mempercepat proses pengambilan keputusan dan meningkatkan daya tarik bagi investor migas. Penelitian ini untuk menganalisis penerapan PSC Gross Split Indonesia dibandingkan dengan fiscal term lain di Asia Tenggara dari sisi keekonomiannya. Perbandingan yang ditinjau adalah antara PSC Gross Split Indonesia dengan fiscal term berikut: PSC Cost Recovery Indonesia, PSC R/C Malaysia, Konsesi Thailand, dan PSC Vietnam. Keempat negara dipilih karena mewakili pemilik remaining reserve dan produsen migas terbesar di kawasan Asia Tenggara. Lapangan yang dijadikan input analisis adalah lapangan minyak dengan recoverable reserve skala kecil menurut RF-2005/SPE, yaitu lapangan produksi Blok X (lapangan early production) dan Blok Y (lapangan terminasi), sehingga diharapkan mampu memberikan gambaran atas daya tarik indikator keekonomian dari PSC Gross Split Indonesia khusus untuk ukuran lapangan yang ditinjau.Dari perhitungan dan perbandingan keekonomian, sensitifitas serta sifat profitabilitasnya, khusus diterapkan pada kondisi lapangan yang ditinjau, diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa PSC Gross Split Indonesia telah memperbaiki indikator keekonomian dibandingkan dengan PSC Cost Recovery Indonesia sehingga PSC Gross Split Indonesia mempunyai indikator tingkat keekonomian yang lebih baik dari PSC Cost Recovery Indonesia ketika dibandingkan dengan PSC R/C Malaysia, Konsesi Thailand dan PSC Vietnam
T The implementation of the Indonesia Gross Split PSC in the upstream oil and gas industry in Indonesia has been running since 2017 with the hope of being able to accelerate the decision-making process and increase attractiveness for oil and gas investors. This study compared Indonesia Gross Split PSC to other fiscal terms in Southeast Asia region from the economic perspective.The comparisons reviewed are between Indonesia Gross Split PSC with : Indonesia Cost Recovery PSC, Malaysia R/C PSC, Thailand Concession, and Vietnam PSC. The countries chosen because they represents the largest oil and gas reserve holder as well as biggest producer in Southeast Asia region. Fields as input are oil production foeld with small-scale recoverable reserves according to RF-2005 / SPE, namely the Block X (initial production field) and Block Y (terminated field). It is expected to be able to provide an overview of the economic attractiveness indicator of the Indonesia Gross Split PSC specific for the size of the field that reviewed.From the result of the economics calculation, sensitivity and profitability characteristics, specifically applied to the field conditions under review, it is found that Indonesia Gross Split PSC has improved economic indicators compared to Indonesia Cost Recovery PSC so that Indonesia Gross Split PSC has a better economic indicator than Indonesia Costs Recovery PSC when it compared to the Malaysia R/C PSC, Thailand Concession and Vietnam PSC.