T he increasing need for fertilizers for agricultural activities, resulting in fertilizer prices rising higher and higher. Therefore, to keep the price of fertilizer that can be affordable to farmers through government-related agencies distribute subsidized fertilizer to farmers. However, this would be used by certain parties to take personal advantage by distributing subsidized fertilizer without permission so that the distribution of subsidized fertilizer is not on target. As was the case in the area of ​​River Island in the district. In 2011 the South Solok Solok Selatan district police have seized unauthorized subsidized fertilizer was 140 sacks. The issue raised is how the subsidized fertilizer distribution arrangements under the Act of Government Regulation No. 8 / Prp / 1962 on trade in goods in the surveillance and whether the defendant meets the formulation of Article 1 letter c Jo Jo's article 4, paragraph 1 of Article 8, paragraph (1) (a district court ruling study Kotobaru RI no. 164 / Pid.B / 2011 / PN .KBR). This study uses the type of research that is descriptive normative analytical using secondary data obtained through the study of literature and qualitative data were processed using deductive logic inference. The results showed that the fertilizer distribution arrangement according to law undnag bersubisdi perpu no.8 / prp / 1962 'guide on trade in goods in the supervision provided for in article 4, paragraph (1) letter a, while the defendant has met the formulation of Article 1 letter c in conjunction with Article 4, paragraph 1 conjunction with Article 8, paragraph (1) with diajtuhi criminal penalties for 4 months. And the types of offenses contained in this case is a formal offense, the commission of the offense, the offense single, specific offense, offense kualifisir.