DETAIL KOLEKSI

Perhitungan keekonomian pada lapangan pengembangan GX dengan metode pcs gross split dan pcs cost recovery


Oleh : Yudha Aswardani

Info Katalog

Nomor Panggil : 907/TP/2018

Penerbit : FTKE - Usakti

Kota Terbit : Jakarta

Tahun Terbit : 2018

Pembimbing 1 : Syamsul Irham

Pembimbing 2 : Listiana Satiawati

Subyek : Gross split - Petroleum engineering;Exploration and exploitation of gas and oil

Kata Kunci : PSC gross split, economic indicators.

Status Posting : Published

Status : Lengkap


File Repositori
No. Nama File Hal. Link
1. 2018_TA_TM_071001300203_Halaman-Judul.pdf
2. 2018_TA_TM_071001300203_Bab-1.pdf
3. 2018_TA_TM_071001300203_Bab-2.pdf
4. 2018_TA_TM_071001300203_Bab-3.pdf
5. 2018_TA_TM_071001300203_Bab-4.pdf
6. 2018_TA_TM_071001300203_Bab-5.pdf
7. 2018_TA_TM_071001300203_Daftar-Pustaka.pdf
8. 2018_TA_TM_071001300203_Lampiran.pdf

K ehadiran sistem kontrak bagi hasil atau PSC dengan metode gross splitseakan menjadi jawaban dari pemerintah Indonesia atas lesunya usaha hulu migasakibat dari minimnya kegiatan eksplorasi minyak dan gas di bumi pertiwi ini.Sistem production sharing contract yang baru ini, dianggap lebih praktis olehpemerintah dan diharapkan lebih menarik bagi para investor dalam melakukankegiatan eksplorasi minyak dan gas di Indonesia guna memenuhi kebutuhan energidalam negeri dan mendongkrak pemasukan negara yang bersumber dari industriminyak dan gas.Namun hal tersebut perlu dibuktikan mengingat belum adanya lapanganminyak dan gas di Indonesia yang telah mengadopsi sistem kontrak bagi hasildengan metode gross split ini. Oleh karena itu, didalam analisa perhitungankeekonomian kali ini akan dibandingkan indikator – inidikator keekonomian sepertinilai NPV, IRR, POT, Total Government Take, dan Total Contractor Take dariperhitungan kontrak bagi hasil dengan metode cost recovery dan gross split.Didalam melakukan perhitungan keekonomian ini digunakan data – datakeekonomian seperti data biaya investasi, data jumlah produksi, dan data nilai yangsesuai berdasarkan kebijakan kontrak yang telah disetujui yang berasal padalapangan GX.Hasil yang diperoleh dari pengolahan data dan penelitian kali ini adalahsistem kontrak bagi hasil dengan menggunakan metode gross split lebihmenguntungkan bagi kontraktor dibandingkan dengan sistem kontrak bagi hasildengan metode cost recovery. Perolehan nilai indikator – indikator keekonomianpada sistem kontrak bagi hasil dengan metode gross split yaitu : NPV dengan nilai105.82 MMUS$, IRR dengan nilai 19.01%, POT dengan nilai 7.76 tahun, TotalGOI take dengan nilai 736.358 MUS$, dan Total Contractor Take dengan nilai1.469.572 MUS$ nilai ini lebih tinggi bila dibandingkan dengan sistem kontrak bagihasil dengan metode cost recovery dimana : NPV dengan nilai 34.57 MMUS$, IRRdengan nilai 12.07%, POT dengan nilai 7.11 tahun, Total GOI take dengan nilai820.860 MUS$, dan Total Contractor Take dengan nilai 1.385.070 MUS$

T he gross split production sharing contract has recently presented by theGovernment of Indonesia in order to become the answer to overcome the depressedsituation in the Indonesian upstream oil and gas business due to the lack ofexploration activities in the Indonesian oil and gas industry. This new productionsharing contract system is being considered by the Government of Indonesia to bemore practical and also it is being expected to be more interesting for investors indoing oil and gas exploration activities in order to fulfill the Indonesia’s energydemand and increasing the revenue from oil and gas industry sector.However, those matters should be proven since there are no oil and gas fieldin Indonesia which have adopted the gross split production sharing contractsystem. Therefore, in this analysis of the economic calculation which based on thecalculation of cost recovery production sharing contract and gross split productionsharing contract will compare several economic indicators such as NPV, IRR, POT,Total Government Take, and Total Contractor Take. In conducting the economiccalculation, it will need several economic data such as investment cost data,production data, and other values which were based on the actual economicagreement which has been approved.The final result of this research is the gross split production sharing contractis more beneficial than the cost recovery production sharing contract for thecontractor. This result is supported by numerous economic indicators whichcalculated based on gross split production sharing contract and cost recoveryproduction sharing contract. Based on gross split production sharing contract thevalue of NPV is 105.82 MMUS$, the value of IRR is 19.01%, the value of POT is7.76 years, the value of Total GOI take is 736.358 MUS$, the value of TotalContractor Take is 1.469.572 MUS$. Based on cost recovery production sharingcontract the value of NPV is 34.57 MMUS$, the value of IRR is 12.07%, the valueof POT is 7.11 years, the value of Total GOI take is 820.860 MUS$, the value ofTotal Contractor Take is 1.385.070 MUS$.

Bagaimana Anda menilai Koleksi ini ?