Pemodelan penilaian pemasok dengan pendekatan analytical hierarchy prpses (studi kasus : PT. Suzuki Indomobil Motor)
Subyek : Human engineering;Personal management
Penerbit : FTI - Usakti
Kota Terbit : Jakarta
Tahun Terbit : 2015
Pembimbing 1 : Triwulandari SD
Kata Kunci : supplier performance evaluation, supplier evaluation criteria and sub-criteria, ahp (analytical hier
Status Posting : Published
Status : Tidak Lengkap
No. | Nama File | Hal. | Link |
---|---|---|---|
1. | 2015_TA_MTI_16130007_Halaman-Judul.pdf | ||
2. | 2015_TA_MTI_16130007_Lembar-Pengesahan.pdf | ||
3. | 2015_TA_MTI_16130007_Bab-1_Pendahuluan.pdf | ||
4. | 2015_TA_MTI_16130007_Bab-2_Tinjauan-Pustaka.pdf |
|
|
5. | 2015_TA_MTI_16130007_Bab-3_Metodologi-Penelitian.pdf |
|
|
6. | 2015_TA_MTI_16130007_Bab-4_Analisis-Sistem.pdf |
|
|
7. | 2015_TA_MTI_16130007_Bab-5_Pemodelan-Sistem.pdf |
|
|
8. | 2015_TA_MTI_16130007_Bab-6_Verifikasi-dan-Validasi.pdf |
|
|
9. | 2015_TA_MTI_16130007_Bab-7_Kesimpulan-dan-Saran.pdf | ||
10. | 2015_TA_MTI_16130007_Daftar-Pustaka.pdf | ||
11. | 2015_TA_MTI_16130007_Lampiran.pdf |
|
P PT. Suzuki Indomobil Motor (SIM) merupakan perusahaan yang bergerak di bidang manufakturing pada sektor automotive. Ketepatan menentukan vendor performance indicators akan menjadi keuntungan perusahaan dalam melakukan evaluasi pemasok secara ketat dan bersaing. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk merancang model penilaian kinerja pemasok. Aliran proses penelitian ini yaitu melakukan analisis sistem sekarang dan melihat kelemahan dan apa kebutuhannya, hal tersebut yang menjadi dasar dalam melakukan pemodelan sistem untuk menjadi lebih baik. Dengan meminta pendapat kepada para pakar dan menggunakan metode pengambilan keputusan yaitu AHP (analytical hierarchy proses) didapatkan 4 kriteria penilaian kinerja terdiri dari kriteria quality, delivery, cost dan response. Melakukan verifikasi dengan mengambil data salah satu supplier, basil nya adalah model yang dibangun dapat mengeluarkan nilai sesuai standart penilaian yang telah ditetapkan dan dapat diimplementasikan. Hasil validasi dari beberapa pakar yaitu Dilihat dari isi atau content penilaian yang dilakukan sudah mencakup kebutuhan customer yaitu quality, cost dan service / pelayanan. Kriteria — kriteria tersebut dapat membuat para pemasok makin ketat dalam bersaing dan melakukan improvement. Kesimpulannya merancang model penilaian performansi pemasok dengan cara melakukan 3 tahapan prinsip dasar yaitu kriteria dan sub-kriteria, proses dan infrastruktur yang menghasilkan model penilaian kinerja dan bobotnya masing-masing yang terdiri dari kriteria quality 1(46%) ; subkriteria (PACS (45%), Warranty Claim (11%), Quality Audit (44%)), delivery (24%) ; (Stop line,Kepping dll (100%), cost (8%) ; (Costdown 100%) dan response (22%) ; (Problem PACS (44%), Problem FT1R (7%), Problem Finding Audit (38%), Problem Stop Line, Kepping dll (11%)).
P PT. Suzuki Indomobil Motor (SIM) is a company engaged in manufacturing in the automotive sector. Accuracy in determining vendor performance indicators will be an advantage for the company in conducting strict and competitive supplier evaluations. This study aims to design a supplier performance assessment model. The flow of this research process is to analyze the current system and see its weaknesses and needs, which is the basis for modeling the system to be better. By asking for opinions from experts and using the decision-making method, namely AHP (analytical hierarchy process), 4 performance assessment criteria were obtained consisting of quality, delivery, cost and response criteria. Verifying by taking data from one of the suppliers, the result is that the model that is built can issue values ​​according to the assessment standards that have been set and can be implemented. The results of validation from several experts are Judging from the content of the assessment carried out, it already covers customer needs, namely quality, cost and service. These criteria can make suppliers even tighter in competing and making improvements. The conclusion is designing a supplier performance assessment model by carrying out 3 stages of basic principles, namely criteria and sub-criteria, processes and infrastructure that produce a performance assessment model and their respective weights consisting of quality criteria 1 (46%); sub-criteria (PACS (45%), Warranty Claim (11%), Quality Audit (44%)), delivery (24%); (Stop line, Kepping etc. (100%), cost (8%); (Costdown 100%) and response (22%); (Problem PACS (44%), Problem FT1R (7%), Problem Finding Audit (38%), Problem Stop Line, Kepping etc. (11%)).