Perbandingan efektivitas splinting kawat komposit dengan splinting fiber reinforced composite untuk stabilisasi gigi goyang(scoping review)
L atar Belakang : Mobilitas gigi adalah penyakit periodontal disertai hilangnya perlekatan ligament periodontal dan kerusakan tulang. Perawatan yang paling umum dilakukan untuk stabilisasi gigi goyang yaitu dengan splinting kawat komposit dan splinting fiber reinforced composite. Namun, dampak buruk terhadap kegagalan splinting dapat menyebabkan trauma oklusi dan karies rekuren. Tujuan : Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk membandingkan efektivitas antara splinting kawat komposit dan splinting fiber reinforced composites untuk stabilisasi gigi goyang. Metode : Penelitian dilakukan denganmengunakan diagram PRISMA dengan database PubMed, Researchgate, danGoogle Scholar dengan pencarian (“PERIODONTAL SPLINTING†OR “WIRESPLINTING†OR “FIBER REINFORCED COMPOSITE SPLINTINGâ€) AND(“PERIODONTITISâ€). Hasil Penelitian : Pencarian awal menunjukkan hasil 385 artikel. Setelah dilakukan penghapusan duplikasi dan penyaringan jurnal secara lengkap untuk kelayakan didapatkan hasil 10, dan peneliti mengidentifikasi 5 artikel yang memenuhi kriteria yang disertakan dalam penelitian ini. Kesimpulan : Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan splinting fiber reinforcedcomposite lebih efektif dibandingkan dengan splinting kawat komposit dari aspek estetika, perikatan dengan permukaan gigi, penurunan mobilitas gigi, dll. Kata Kunci : Mobilitas Gigi, Splinting, Kawat Komposit, Fiber Reinforced Composite
B ackground: Tooth mobility is a periodontal disease accompanied by loss of periodontal ligament attachment and bone destruction. Treatment for stabilization of loose teeth is splinting. The two most commonly used materials are composite wire splinting and fiber reinforced composite splinting. However, there is a dilemma in the community regarding the selection of materials that are more effective for the immobolization of loose teeth. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness between composite wire splinting and fiber reinforced composites splinting for the stabilization of loose teeth. Methods: The study was conducted using the PRISMA diagram with PubMed, Researchgate, Tripdatabase and Google Scholar databases by searching (\\\"PERIODONTAL SPLINTING\\\" OR \\\"WIRE SPLINTING\\\" OR \\\"FIBER REINFORCED COMPOSITE SPLINTING\\\") AND (\\\"PERIODONTITIS\\\"). Results: The initialsearch showed 385 articles. After removal of duplicates and complete screening of journals for eligibility, the results were 10, and the researcher identified 5 articles that met the criteria for inclusion in this study. Conclusion: Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that composite wire splinting is more effective than fiber reinforced composite splinting because it effectively reduces tooth mobility and is more stable for loose teeth.