B Based on the doctrine of corporate law, third parties can seek justice for the company\'s losses incurred by the directors through a court lawsuit with the doctrine of Piercing the Corporate Veil in Article 97 paragraph (3) of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies. In Decision Number 19/Pdt.G/2023/PN Sda, the panel of judges rejected the third party\\\'s lawsuit against the directors of the company. The panel of judges argued that Article 97 paragraph (3) of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies regulates the request for liability of directors for losses suffered by the company, not third parties. The problem is whether the consideration of the panel of judges is in accordance with the doctrine of Piercing the Corporate Veil in Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies and the doctrine of corporate law. As well as, how is the responsibility of the directors of PT Hair Star Indonesia for the loss of PT Bank OCBC NISP Tbk for violating the negative covenants clause of the credit agreement according to statutory regulations. To answer the problem, descriptive research is conducted with normative research on the principles of corporate law and related laws and regulations. The research was conducted with qualitative data processing and deductive inference. The results illustrate that the judge\\\'s consideration of the liability of the directors of PT Hair Star Indonesia is not in accordance with Piercing the Corporate Veil. The immaterial losses of PT OCBC NISP Tbk caused by the violation of the negative covenants clause of the credit agreement by PT Hair Star Indonesia can cause the directors of PT Hair Star Indonesia to be fully personally liable for the losses of PT Bank OCBC NISP Tbk in accordance with Article 97 paragraph (3) of the Company Law.