O On March 15, 2022, the European Commission issued Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/433 imposing Countervailing Duty on stainless steel products from Indonesia. The European Union considers Indonesia to be in violation of GATT and SCM Agreement rules by alleging that its domestic stainless steel products are subsidized by the Chinese Government. This raises the issue of whether subsidies on stainless steel products from Indonesia exported to the European Union violate the rules of the GATT/WTO Agreement. Then how is the suitability of the imposition of Countervailing Duty by the European Union on stainless steel products from Indonesia with the rules of the GATT/WTO Agreement?. This research is a normative research with a descriptive nature to examine subsidies as argued by the European Union. Secondary data is the main reference which is processed qualitatively and collected through library research. Finally, deductive conclusions are drawn from the analysis that has been carried out. The results of this study illustrate that subsidies on stainless steel products from Indonesia exported to the European Union do not violate the rules of the GATT/WTO Agreement because they do not fulfill the elements of Article XVI paragraph (1) of the GATT and Article 1 paragraph (1) of the SCM Agreement. The transnational subsidy is not regulated in the SCM Agreement, which only regulates subsidies within the jurisdiction of the subsidizer. In addition, there is no conformity between the imposition of Countervailing Duty by the European Union and the GATT/WTO Agreement rules because the subsidy elements are not fulfilled. The imposition of Countervailing Duty by the European Union itself violates Article 11 paragraph (2) of the SCM Agreement.