D Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023, which is a judicial review case of Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections against the 1945 Constitution, has attracted public attention both from a legal perspective. The decision is considered to have several problems in terms of the Constitutional Court\\\'s Procedural Law. The problems are: (1) Are the considerations of the Constitutional Court Judges in deciding decision number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 in accordance with Law Number 24 of 2003 concerning the Constitutional Court? And (2) Is the Constitutional Court allowed to add norms to the decision number 90/PUU-XXI/2023? The research uses a normative method with a descriptive research nature. The data used is secondary data with qualitative data analysis, data collection using literature studies. Conclusions are drawn deductively. The results of the study illustrate that the judge\\\'s considerations regarding the applicant\\\'s legal standing are not in accordance with the statutory regulations, both those regulated in Article 51 Paragraph (1) of the Constitutional Court Law or the jurisprudence of Constitutional Court Decision Number 48 of 2011. And also based on expert opinion and jurisprudence, the author is of the opinion that the Constitutional Court\\\'s actions in adding norms to its decision are irrelevant, because adding norms to the decision of the Constitutional Court is permitted if the aim is to avoid a legal vacuum.