T The case of sexual violence in decision no. 60/pid.sus/2024/pn.ban involved hamid bin salli, the biological father of the victim, who sexually assaulted his daughter while she was sleeping using violence and threats. the defendant\\\'s actions violated article 76e in conjunction with article 82(1) of the child protection act. the judge imposed a prison sentence of 5 years and 6 months and a fine of rp30 million. the basis of the issue is 1) is the criminal sanction imposed in accordance with article 82(1) in conjunction with article 76e of law no. 35 of 2014 of the republic of indonesia on child protection (judgment no. 60/pid.sus/2024/pn.ban)? 2) is the imposition of sanctions by the judge on the perpetrator of child molestation in accordance with the purpose of criminal punishment? this research is a normative study with a descriptive nature. the type of data used is secondary data. data analysis was conducted using qualitative methods with deductive logical decision-making. the conclusions drawn are 1) the act of child sexual abuse by a biological parent under article 82(1) in conjunction with article 76e of law no. 35 of 2014 on child protection is not appropriate; instead, article 82(2) in conjunction with article 76e should apply because the perpetrator is a legal subject with a blood relationship, namely the biological father of the child victim. 2) the imposition of a five-year criminal sentence is not appropriate because it does not reflect the objectives of criminal punishment, namely 3r and 1d.