T The defendant Yahya Tohirin, a driver, and Rahmat Setiawan, a travel reserve driver, transported 9 (nine) passengers to Lampung province, the passengers did not have a Rapid Test/antigen Swab result letter for travel requirements during the PPKM period. As a solution, the defendants asked witness Daud to make 8 (eight) Rapid Test/swab letters using the clinic or hospital logo which had been scanned previously and was on the computer, and then filled in the name and address of the passenger according to the KTP with negative results. , then printed on a printer and signed by witness Daud in accordance with (Decision No.814/PID.B/2021/PNSRG). The issue raised is "Are the perpetrator's actions in accordance with the articles in the indictment charged in (Decision Number.814/Pid.B/2021/PN.Srg)?" and "Is the punishment for the perpetrator's actions appropriate in (Decision Number.814/Pid.B/2021/PN.Srg)?" This research is normative juridical research with analytical descriptive methods, using secondary data which is then analyzed qualitatively by drawing conclusions logically deductively. The conclusion of this research is that the perpetrator's actions are punished in accordance with the provisions of Article 93 in conjunction with Article 9 (1) of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6 of 2018 concerning Health Quarantine, however the punishment of the perpetrator's actions based on the theory of punishment is not appropriate because the criminal sanctions are too light, because in fact The perpetrator committed more than one criminal act, but because the public prosecutor's indictment was inaccurate in determining the relevant articles and combining the articles, the perpetrator's actions could not be declared to have committed more than one criminal act.