Perbedaan pengaruh perendaman yoghurt dairy-based dan plant-based terhadap kekasaran permukaan resin komposit nanofiller
Nomor Panggil : 617.634 2 PRI p
Penerbit : FKG - Usakti
Kota Terbit : Jakarta
Tahun Terbit : 2025
Pembimbing 1 : Iskandar Wahid
Pembimbing 2 : Melaniwati
Subyek : Conservative dentistry
Kata Kunci : dairy-based yogurt, plant-based yogurt, surface roughness, acidic pH, nanofiller composite resin
Status Posting : Published
Status : Lengkap
No. | Nama File | Hal. | Link |
---|---|---|---|
1. | 2025_SK_SIG_040002100149_Halaman-Judul.pdf | ||
2. | 2025_SK_SIG_040002100149_Surat-Pernyataan-Revisi-Terakhir.pdf | 1 | |
3. | 2025_SK_SIG_040002100149_Surat-Hasil-Similaritas.pdf | 1 | |
4. | 2025_SK_SIG_040002100149_Halaman-Pernyataan-Persetujuan-Publikasi-Tugas-Akhir-untuk-Kepentingan-Akademis.pdf | 1 | |
5. | 2025_SK_SIG_040002100149_Lembar-Pengesahan.pdf | 2 | |
6. | 2025_SK_SIG_040002100149_Pernyataan-Orisinalitas.pdf | 1 | |
7. | 2025_SK_SIG_040002100149_Formulir-Persetujuan-Publikasi-Karya-Ilmiah.pdf | 1 | |
8. | 2025_SK_SIG_040002100149_Bab-1.pdf | ||
9. | 2025_SK_SIG_040002100149_Bab-2.pdf |
|
|
10. | 2025_SK_SIG_040002100149_Bab-3.pdf |
|
|
11. | 2025_SK_SIG_040002100149_Bab-4.pdf |
|
|
12. | 2025_SK_SIG_040002100149_Bab-5.pdf |
|
|
13. | 2025_SK_SIG_040002100149_Bab-6.pdf |
|
|
14. | 2025_SK_SIG_040002100149_Bab-7.pdf | ||
15. | 2025_SK_SIG_040002100149_Daftar-Pustaka.pdf | ||
16. | 2025_SK_SIG_040002100149_Lampiran.pdf | 10 |
|
L Latar Belakang: Resin komposit nanofiller merupakan bahan restorasi gigi yangbanyak dipilih dikarenakan estetik dan kekuatan mekanis yang baik, tetapimemiliki sifat fisik absorpsi cairan. Makanan dan minuman yang dikonsumsiterlebih jika bersifat asam dapat berpengaruh pada kekasaran permukaan resinkomposit nanofiller. pH yang rendah pada yoghurt dairy-based dan plant-baseddapat menyebabkan degradasi pada resin komposit nanofiller. Tujuan: Untukmengetahui perbedaan pengaruh perendaman yoghurt dairy-based dan plantbased terhadap kekasaran permukaan resin komposit nanofiller. Metode:Penelitian ini merupakan eksperimental laboratoris dengan rancangan post testwith control group design. Jumlah sampel 30 sampel resin komposit nanofilleryang berdiameter 6 mm dan tinggi 2 mm dibentuk menggunakan stainless steelmold. Kelompok kontrol direndam selama 24 jam dalam saliva buatan, sedangkankelompok perlakuan direndam selama 2 jam dalam yoghurt dairy-based danyoghurt plant-based dilanjutkan dengan perendaman dalam saliva buatan selama22 jam. Perendaman sampel dilakukan selama 10 hari dalam inkubator dengansuhu 37°C. Pengujian kekasaran permukaan menggunakan surface roughnesstester. Hasil: Hasil uji One Way ANOVA kekasaran (p= 0.000) menunjukkanadanya perbedaan bermakna. Hasil Post Hoc Tukey menunjukkan perbedaanbermakna pada kelompok kontrol dengan yoghurt dairy-based, kontrol denganyoghurt plant-based dan yoghurt dairy-based dengan yoghurt plant-based.Kesimpulan: Adanya perbedaan nilai kekasaran, paling tinggi yaitu yoghurtdairy-based karena pH yoghurt dairy-based lebih asam dibandingkan yoghurtplant-based.
B Background: Nanofiller composite resin is a widely chosen dental restorativematerial due to its its excellent aesthetics and mechanical strength, however itexhibits the physical property of fluid absorption. The consumption of acidic foodsand beverages can influence the surface roughness of nanofiller composite resin.The low pH of dairy-based and plant-based yoghurt may cause degradation ofnanofiller composite resin. Objective: To determine the difference in the effects ofimmersion in dairy-based and plant-based yogurt on the surface roughness ofnanofiller composite resin. Methods: This study employed an experimentallaboratory design with a post-test with control group design. A total of 30 samplesof nanofiller composite resin, each 6 mm in diameter and 2 mm in height, wereprepared using stainless steel molds. The control group was immersed in artificialsaliva for 24 hours, while the treatment groups were immersed for 2 hours in dairybased yogurt and plant-based yogurt, followed by immersion in artificial saliva for22 hours. The immersion process was carried out for 10 days in an incubator at37°C. Surface roughness was tested using a surface roughness tester. Results: Theresults of the One-Way ANOVA test for surface roughness (p = 0.000) indicated asignificant difference. The Post Hoc Tukey test showed significant differencesbetween the control group and dairy-based yogurt, the control group and plantbased yogurt, and between dairy-based and plant-based yogurt. Conclusion: Therewere differences in surface roughness values, with the highest roughness observedin the dairy-based yogurt group due to its more acidic pH compared to plant-basedyogurt.