Analisis oral health related quality of life yang diukur menggunakan indeks chronic oral mucosal disease-26 (COMDQ-26) dan oral health impact profile-14 (OHIP-14) pada pasien dengan lesi oral
L Latar Belakang: Penyakit mukosa mulut dapat berdampak terhadap kualitas hidup. Lesi pada mukosa mulut dibagi menjadi akut dan kronis. OHRQoL merupakan alat mampu mengukur dampak dari penyakit rongga mulut terhadap kualitas hidup. Salah satu OHRQoL yang sering digunakan adalah OHIP-14 danCOMDQ-26. Tujuan: Untuk menganalisis kualitas hidup menggunakan indeksCOMDQ-26 dan OHIP-14 pada pasien dengan lesi oral akut dan kronis. Metode:penelitian observasional analitik dengan rancangan cross sectional. Penelitian inidilakukan dengan melakukan pemeriksaan lesi oral dan pengisian kuesioner OHIP-14 dan COMDQ-26. Analisis menggunakan korelasi pearson. Hasil: COMDQ-26versi bahasa Indonesia memiliki Cronbach alpha 0,83 dan reliabilitas item 0,92.Lesi oral akut (n=7) menunjukkan nilai COMDQ-26 31 (24-53) dan OHIP-14 8 (2-25), sedangkan lesi oral kronis (n=23) menunjukkan nilai 32 (13-73) vs 5 (0-33).Tidak ditemukan hubungan antara jenis lesi oral dengan kuesioner OHRQoLnamun ditemukan hubungan antara domain COMDQ-26 dan domain OHIP-14(p<0.05), kecuali COMDQ-26 domain 4 tidak berhubungan dengan domain OHIP-14 (p>0.05). Kesimpulan: COMDQ-26 versi bahasa Indonesia memiliki validitaskonstruk yang baik namun masih belum dapat membedakan dampak kualitas hidupberdasarkan jenis lesi oral. Penelitian lebih lanjut perlu dilakukan untuk konfirmasipenggunaan COMDQ-26 versi bahasa Indonesia.
B Background: Quality of life could well be affected by oral mucosal diseases suchas acute and chronic oral lesions. OHRQoL is a tool that could assess whether oraldiseases impair a person's quality of life. OHIP-14 and COMDQ-26 are two of theOHRQoLs that have been frequently used. Objective: To analyze the quality of lifeusing the COMDQ-26 and OHIP-14 indices in patients with acute and chronic orallesions. Methods: This study used analytic observational research using a crosssectionaldesign. Examining oral lesions and completing the OHIP-14 andCOMDQ-26 questionnaires were conducted to 30 subjects. Pearson's correlationwas used to analyze data. Results: The item reliability for the Indonesian versionof the COMDQ-26 was 0.92 and the Cronbach alpha was 0.83. COMDQ-26score 31 (24-53) and OHIP-14 score 8 (2-25) were observed in acute oral lesions(n=7), whereas 32 (13-73) and 5 (0-33) were present in chronic oral lesions (n=23).There was no correlation between the type of oral lesions and the OHRQoLquestionnaires (p>0.05), however it was found that the COMDQ-26 domain and theOHIP-14 domain were significantly correlated (p<0.05), with the exception of thefinding that COMDQ-26 domain 4 was not associated to any of the OHIP-14domain (p>0.05). Conclusion: Despite having strong construct validity, theIndonesian version of the COMDQ-26 remains unable to differentiate between theimpact of quality of life based on the nature of an oral lesion. The use of theIndonesian version of the COMDQ-26 has to be confirmed by additionalinvestigation.