Pemodelan penilaian pemasok dengan pendekatan analytical hierarchy proses studi kasus : PT. Suzuki Indomobil Motor
Info Katalog
File Repositori
Subyek : Management - Industrial engineering
Penerbit : FTI - Usakti
Kota Terbit : Jakarta
Tahun Terbit : 2015
Pembimbing 1 : Triwulandari
Kata Kunci : supplier performance evaluation, criteria and sub-criteria evaluation supplier, ahp (analytical hier
Status Posting : Published
Status : Lengkap
File Repositori
| No. | Nama File | Hal. | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 2015_TS_MTI_163130007_Halaman-Judul.pdf | ||
| 2. | 2015_TS_MTI_163130007_Lembar-Pengesahan.pdf | ||
| 3. | 2015_TS_MTI_163130007_Bab-1_Pendahuluan.pdf | ||
| 4. | 2015_TS_MTI_163130007_Bab-2_Tinjauan-Pustaka.pdf |
|
|
| 5. | 2015_TS_MTI_163130007_Bab-3_Metodologi-Penelitian.pdf |
|
|
| 6. | 2015_TS_MTI_163130007_Bab-4_Analisis-Sistem.pdf |
|
|
| 7. | 2015_TS_MTI_163130007_Bab-5_Pemodelan-Sistem.pdf |
|
|
| 8. | 2015_TS_MTI_163130007_Bab-6_Verifikasi-dan-Validasi.pdf |
|
|
| 9. | 2015_TS_MTI_163130007_Bab-7_Kesimpulan-dan-Saran.pdf |
|
|
| 10. | 2015_TS_MTI_163130007_Daftar-Pustaka.pdf | ||
| 11. | 2015_TS_MTI_163130007_Lampiran.pdf |
|
P PT. Suzuki Indomobil Motor (SIM) merupakan perusahaan yang bergerak di bidang manufakturing pada sektor automotive. Ketepatan menentukan vendor performance indicators akan menjadi keuntungan perusahaan dalam melakukan evaluasi pemasok secara ketat dan bersaing. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk merancang model penilaian kinerja pemasok. Aliran proses penelitian ini yaitu melakukan analisis sistem sekarang dan melihat kelemahan dan apa kebutuhannya, hal tersebut yang menjadi dasar dalam melakukan pemodelan sistem untuk menjadi lebih baik. Dengan meminta pendapat kepada para pakar dan menggunakan metode pengambilan keputusan yaitu AHP (analytical hierarchy proses) didapatkan 4 kriteria penilaian kinerja terdiri dan kriteria quality, delivery, cost dan response. Melakukan verifikasi dengan mengambil data salah satu supplier, hasil nya adalah model yang dibangun dapat mengeluarkan nilai sesuai standart penilaian yang telah ditetapkan dan dapat diimplementasikan. Hasil validasi dari beberapa pakar yaitu Dilihat dari isi atau content penilaian yang dilakukan sudah mencakup kebutuhan customer yaitu quality, cost dan service / pelayanan. Kriteria — kriteria tersebut dapat membuat para pemasok makin ketat dalam bersaing dan melakukan improvement. Kesimpulannya merancang model penilaian performansi pemasok dengan cara melakukan 3 tahapan prinsip dasar yaitu kriteria dan sub-kriteria, proses dan infrastruktur yang menghasilkan model penilaian kinerja dan bobotnya masing-masing yang terdiri dan kriteria quality 1(46%) ; subkriteria (PACS (45%), Warranty Claim (11%), Quality Audit (44%)), delivery (24%) ; (Stop line,Kepping dll (100%), cost (8%) ; (Costdown 100%) dan response (22%) ; (Problem PACS (44%), Problem FTIR (7%), Problem Finding Audit (38%), Problem Stop Line, Kepping dll (11%)).
P PT. Suzuki Indomobil Motor (SIM) is a company engaged in the field of manufacturing in the automotive sector. The accuracy of determining the vendor performance indicators will be in the company's profits are strictly evaluating suppliers and compete. This study aims to design a model of supplier performance assessment. The process flow of this research is to analyze the current system and see the weaknesses and what it needs, it is that the basis for modeling the system for the better. By asking the opinion of the experts and decision-making method that AHP (analytical hierarchy process) obtained 4 performance assessment criteria consist of criteria quality, delivery, cost and response. To verify the data by taking one of the suppliers, its result is a model that is built can be issued according to standard appraisal value has been established and can be implemented. The results of the validation of some experts that terms of content or content assessment done already includes customer needs, namely quality, cost and service / services. Criteria - criteria can be made more stringent suppliers to compete and perform improvement. Conclusion is designing model supplier performance assessment by means of three stages, namely the basic principle of the criteria and sub-criteria, processes and infrastructure that results in performance assessment models and their respective weights consisting of the first quality criteria (46%); sub criteria (PACS (45%), Warranty Claim (11%), Quality Audit (44%)), delivery (24%); (Stop Online, kepping etc (100%), cost (8%); (Cost down 100%) and response (22%); (PACS Problem (44%), Problem FTIR (7%), Problem Finding Audit (38% ), Problem Stop Line, kepping etc. (11%)).
Info Koleksi Thesis
Universitas
Fakultas
Tahun Terbit