DETAIL KOLEKSI

Analisis keekonomian blok terminasi NIS dengan menggunakan PSC gross split dan PSC cost recovery


Oleh : Nisrina Afiati

Info Katalog

Nomor Panggil : 1231/TP/2012

Penerbit : FTKE - Usakti

Kota Terbit : Jakarta

Tahun Terbit : 2020

Pembimbing 1 : Syamsul Irham

Pembimbing 2 : Havidh Pramadika

Subyek : Petroleum industry - Government policy

Kata Kunci : economic analysis, gross split, cost recovery.

Status Posting : Published

Status : Lengkap


File Repositori
No. Nama File Hal. Link
1. 2020_TA_STP_071001500107_Halaman-judul.pdf 13
2. 2020_TA_STP_071001500107_Pengesahan.pdf 1
3. 2020_TA_STP_071001500107_Bab-1_Pendahuluan.pdf 4
4. 2020_TA_STP_071001500107_Bab-2_Tinjauan-Literatur.pdf 7
5. 2020_TA_STP_071001500107_Bab-3_Kerangka-Konsep.pdf
6. 2020_TA_STP_071001500107_Bab-4_Metode.pdf
7. 2020_TA_STP_071001500107_Bab-5_Kesimpulan.pdf
8. 2020_TA_STP_071001500107_Daftar-Pustaka.pdf
9. 2020_TA_STP_071001500107_Lampiran.pdf

K Kontrak yang digunakan di Indonesia pada saat ini merupakan kontrakbagi hasil (Production Sharing Contract) model baru yaitu PSC Gross Split.Berdasarkan Peraturan Menteri ESDM tahun 2017, PSC Gross Split merupakanpengganti kontrak kerja sama sebelumnya, yaitu PSC Cost Recovery. Penggantiankontrak kerja sama ini dilakukan karena PSC Cost Recovery dinilai kurangefektif. Oleh karena itu, untuk membuktikan apakah PSC Gross Split akan lebihefektif dibandingkan dengan PSC Cost Recovery, maka dilakukan perbandingannilai indikator keekonomian pada Blok terminasi “NIS”. Berdasarkan penelitianyang dilakukan pada Blok terminasi “NIS”, didapatkan hasil perhitunganmenggunakan PSC Cost Recovery, didapatkan nilai NPV sebesar 54MMUS$,MIRR sebesar 12%, Contractor Take sebesar 3.1BUS$, dan Government Takesebesar 965MMUS$. Sementara itu, hasil perhitungan menggunakan PSC GrossSplit, didapatkan nilai NPV sebesar -141MMUS$, MIRR Sebesar 4%, ContractorTake sebesar 2.6BUS$, dan Government Take sebesar 1.4BUS$.Berdasarkan hasil tersebut, dapat diketahui bahwa PSC Gross Split tidakmemberikan nilai yang lebih atraktif dibandingkan dengan PSC Cost Recovery.Oleh karena itu, diberikanlah penambahan diskresi sebesar 22.2% agar hasilperhitungan PSC Gross Split tetap atraktif. Setelah penambahan diskresi,didapatkan nilai NPV sebesar 217MMUS$, MIRR sebesar 18%, Contractor Takesebesar 3.5BUS$, dan Government Take sebesar 676MMUS$

T The contract used in Indonesia at the moment is a new production sharingcontract, PSC Gross Split. Based on the 2017 Minister of Energy and MineralResources Regulation, the Gross Split PSC is a substitute for the previouscooperation contract, the PSC Cost Recovery. This contract replacement wascarried out because PSC Cost Recovery was considered less effective. Therefore,to prove whether the Gross Split PSC will be more effective than the PSC CostRecovery, a comparison of the economic indicator values on the termination block"NIS" is conducted.Based on research conducted on the termination block "NIS", the resultsobtained calculations using PSC Cost Recovery, obtained an NPV value of54MMUS$, MIRR of 12%, a Contarctor Take of 3.1BUS$, and a GovernmentTake of 965MMUS$. Meanwhile, the results of calculations using the PSC GrossSplit, obtained NPV value of -141MMUS$, MIRR of 4%, Contractor Take of2.6BUS$, and Government Take of 1.4BUS$.Based on these results, it can be seen that the Gross Split PSC does notprovide a more attractive value compared to the PSC Cost Recovery. Therefore,an additional discretion of 22.2% is given to make the results of the Gross SplitPSC calculation remain attractive. After the addition of discretion, NPV values of217MMUS$ are obtained, MIRR of 18%, Contractor Take of 3.5BUS$, andGovernment Take of 676MMUS$.

Bagaimana Anda menilai Koleksi ini ?